ECMO for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

August 17, 2020

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides a potential rescue therapy for critically ill COVID-19 patients. ECMO therapy comprises of a machine that oxygenates a patient’s blood outside the body. Tubing connects blood flow to an artificial lung; this lung adds oxygen to and extracts carbon dioxide from the blood. The machine warms the blood to body temperature and pumps it back into the patient’s body.1  

Two types of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation exist: venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA). In VV ECMO, the machine removes blood from the venous system, passes it through the oxygenator, and returns the blood to the lungs.2 VV ECMO only provides pulmonary support. VA ECMO, however, provides both pulmonary and hemodynamic support.3 In VA ECMO, the machine removes blood from the venous system and returns it to the arterial system.   

Past precedent suggests that ECMO therapy may prove beneficial for COVID-19 patients who suffer acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Previously, numerous studies concluded that ECMO therapy appeared to lower mortality in influenza A (H1N1)-related ARDS patients compared to those who did not receive ECMO therapy.4–8 Likewise, a retrospective study recommended ECMO as a rescue therapy for Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) patients with refractory respiratory failure.9 However, medicine has little experience that can directly inform the administration of ECMO therapy to critically ill COVID-19 patients.10 

Only a few studies report ECMO therapy for COVID-19-related ARDS patients.11–17 These studies show an approximate mortality of 82.3% for the adult patients who receive ECMO therapy.18 Yang et al.,14 for example, reported that five of six patients on ECMO died; the sixth patient remained on ECMO at the study’s conclusion. Furthermore, Zhang et al.17 observed 10 patients on ECMO: the hospital discharged two patients, three died, and five remained on ECMO when the study concluded.   

Recommendations suggest that physicians consider ECMO only when conventional management fails.19 Generally, protocol classifies patients who, despite optimal care, experience high mortality risk and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio below 100 as potential ECMO candidates.20 Specifically, ECMO candidates present as adult and pediatric patients with ARDS-related refractory hypoxemia in whom lung-protective ventilation fails.21 Protocol, however, strongly emphasizes the maximization of conventional ARDS therapies prior to ECMO consideration.22 These therapies include prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, and recruitment maneuvers.22,23 

References 

1. UCSF Health. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). ucsfhealth.org https://www.ucsfhealth.org/treatments/extracorporeal-membrane-oxygenation (2020). 

2. Makdisi, G. & Wang, I. Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology. J. Thorac. Dis. 7, E166–E176 (2015). 

3. Hoyler, M. M., Flynn, B., Iannacone, E. M., Jones, M.-M. & Ivascu, N. S. Clinical Management of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. (2020) doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.12.047

4. The Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ & ECMO) Influenza Investigators. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. JAMA 302, 1888–1895 (2009). 

5. Noah, M. A. et al. Referral to an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center and Mortality Among Patients With Severe 2009 Influenza A(H1N1). JAMA 306, 1659–1668 (2011). 

6. Peek, G. J. et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond. Engl. 374, 1351–1363 (2009). 

7. Goligher, E. C. et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Posterior Probability of Mortality Benefit in a Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 320, 2251–2259 (2018). 

8. Hong, H. a. et al. The safety of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus indicus as food probiotics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105, 510–520 (2008). 

9. Alshahrani, M. S. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Ann. Intensive Care 8, 3 (2018). 

10. Hong, X., Xiong, J., Feng, Z. & Shi, Y. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): does it have a role in the treatment of severe COVID-19? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 78–80 (2020). 

11. Huang, C. et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet 395, 497–506 (2020). 

12. Chen, N. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet 395, 507–513 (2020). 

13. Wang, D. et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 323, 1061–1069 (2020). 

14. Yang, X. et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 475–481 (2020). 

15. Guan, W. et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032

16. Zhou, F. et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 395, 1054–1062 (2020). 

17. Zhang, G. et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 221 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. J. Clin. Virol. 127, 104364 (2020). 

18. Ñamendys-Silva, S. A. ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19. Heart Lung 49, 348–349 (2020). 

19. Alhazzani, W. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. 46, 854–887 (2020). 

20. Bartlett, R. H. et al. Initial ELSO Guidance Document: ECMO for COVID-19 Patients with Severe Cardiopulmonary Failure. Asaio J. 66, 472–474 (2020). 

21. World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Interim guidance. 19 http://www.pimr.pl/index.php/issues/2020-vol-16-no-1/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-sari-when-covid-19-disease-is-suspected-interim-guidance?aid=1463 (2020). 

22. Extracorporeral Life Support Organization (ELSO). Guidelines for Adult Respiratory Failure. 32 (2017). 

23. Matthay, M. A., Aldrich, J. M. & Gotts, J. E. Treatment for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 433–434 (2020). 

24. Extracorporeral Life Support Organization (ELSO). COVID-19 Interim Guidelines: A consensus document from an international group of interdisciplinary ECMO providers. 37 (2020). 

25. Extracorporeral Life Support Organization (ELSO). Guidelines for Adult Cardiac Failure. 5 (2013). 

26. MacLaren, G., Fisher, D. & Brodie, D. Preparing for the Most Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: The Potential Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. JAMA 323, 1245–1246 (2020). 

27. Ramanathan, K. et al. Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 518–526 (2020).